From: Bart Croughs <bart.croughs@tip.nl>
To: “‘cypherpunks@toad.com>
Message Hash: 585c2867402a4e5e4cfcb79d4812422874c7f6e27d1a29a91b515559720f20f0
Message ID: <01BB8D2F.B10B2EA0@groningen12.pop.tip.nl>
Reply To: N/A
UTC Datetime: 1996-08-18 19:06:30 UTC
Raw Date: Mon, 19 Aug 1996 03:06:30 +0800
From: Bart Croughs <bart.croughs@tip.nl>
Date: Mon, 19 Aug 1996 03:06:30 +0800
To: "'cypherpunks@toad.com>
Subject: Re: National Socio-Economic Security Need for Encryption Technology
Message-ID: <01BB8D2F.B10B2EA0@groningen12.pop.tip.nl>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
Mike McNally wrote:
>Bart Croughs wrote:
>> ... better arguments (after reading the books I suggested)
>Like what is it with you and these books? Is "Austrian" a code word
>for "Divine omniscient extraterrestrial super-being"?
No, but a number of posters claimed they were Austrians, and among them was Timothy May. So if I can show that Timothy's statements contradict the economic theories he says he supports on the most fundamental level (the level of methodology), then I have a pretty solid case that he is a bit confused and that he should do his homework better before he continues arguing. Unless of course he can show the Austrians (or me) to be wrong; but he hasn't done this yet.
>Through all this sophist gibberish I've completely lost track of
>what exactly it is you're trying to say.
I don't blame you when you get the impression that Austrian methodology, compressed in a couple of sentences, is sophist gibberish. Without the proper background knowledge, this is probably unavoidable; methodology is a rather difficult subject. But if you are really interested and want to know more about it, you now know where to look...
Bart Croughs
Return to August 1996
Return to “Mike McNally <m5@tivoli.com>”