From: tcmay@got.net (Timothy C. May)
To: David Kennedy <76702.3557@compuserve.com>
Message Hash: 588417c6250f1d27400d3040c1d41c415ef53a22791e49c8a7106da6c2f4f758
Message ID: <ae354cda0c021004454b@[205.199.118.202]>
Reply To: N/A
UTC Datetime: 1996-08-13 07:16:16 UTC
Raw Date: Tue, 13 Aug 1996 15:16:16 +0800
From: tcmay@got.net (Timothy C. May)
Date: Tue, 13 Aug 1996 15:16:16 +0800
To: David Kennedy <76702.3557@compuserve.com>
Subject: Re: Hoax: A ban on cryptography?
Message-ID: <ae354cda0c021004454b@[205.199.118.202]>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
At 2:37 AM 8/13/96, David Kennedy wrote:
>My mailer thinks the e$pam list pulled this from cypherpunks:
>
And I'll bet you're still looking for "Oceania" in your atlas?
This is one of the main reasons I hate it when my articles get "spammed" to
other lists, lists where people have no idea of who I am and no idea of my
sense of humor.
For the clueless, I simply took the "Defense Authorization" bill which had
been posted to Cypherpunks by geeman@best.com and replaced a few of the
words involving "explosives" with "cryptography." Oh, and I twiddled the
number of the bill to include "666." Finally, I even said "This may not be
real, but it could be" at the end.
Jeesh.
The worst part of having my stuff spammed, e-spammed, gurgitated, and
regurgitated is that I get letters from people saying "I saw this thing you
wrote on the Kangaroo Hopping List. What is "crypto"? Thanks a bunch,
dude."
Wake up.
And for those who forward my stuff, please include appropriate disclaimers
to your "spammees" that a) one should read things with an appreciation that
a post may be tongue in cheek, b) that back-spamming to another list is not
cool, and c) that I don't want to be bothered.
>>> S.1666
>
> Department of Commerce Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 1997 (Passed by the
> Senate) <<
>
>And this is bogus, and as far as I can tell not a typo, it's complete hokum.
>
>S.1666 is an obscure bill about courts in Utah.
>
>A search of http://thomas.loc.gov on "encryption" reveals the expected bills,
>PRO-CODE etc.
>
>A search for the DoC Authorization Act reveals nothing, as far as I can tell
>this bill has not been drafted let alone passed. I don't know enough about how
>the DoC is funded to know if they get their own Authorization Act or receive
>authorizations piecemeal and by the reconciliation.
>
>Again, this is bogus.
>
>!^NavFont02F02350014QGHHG|MG~HG85QG87HI}2126
Boycott "Big Brother Inside" software!
We got computers, we're tapping phone lines, we know that that ain't allowed.
---------:---------:---------:---------:---------:---------:---------:----
Timothy C. May | Crypto Anarchy: encryption, digital money,
tcmay@got.net 408-728-0152 | anonymous networks, digital pseudonyms, zero
W.A.S.T.E.: Corralitos, CA | knowledge, reputations, information markets,
Licensed Ontologist | black markets, collapse of governments.
"National borders aren't even speed bumps on the information superhighway."
Return to August 1996
Return to “tcmay@got.net (Timothy C. May)”