From: Charley Sparks <sparks@bah.com>
Date: Tue, 13 Aug 1996 21:20:51 +0800
To: EALLENSMITH@ocelot.Rutgers.EDU
Subject: Fw: Police on the Net
Message-ID: <199608130953.FAA21599@booz.bah.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain


-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----

To: EALLENSMITH@ocelot.Rutgers.EDU, cypherpunks@toad.com
Date: Tue Aug 13 05:55:50 1996
If any of us find the address, please post the addresses here.....
- -----Begin Included Message ----- 

Date: Mon, 12 Aug 1996 19:08 EDT
 From: "E. ALLEN SMITH" <EALLENSMITH@ocelot.Rutgers.EDU>
To: cypherpunks@toad.com
Cc: 


        First, I'd be interested in knowing some of those online reporting
addresses, and how much limits they place on what can be mailed to them...
persuading these cops to deal with the improper use of another's computer
(i.e., spam) would seem to be a distinct possibility in diverting them from
other activities. Second, it would appear possible (unless they're 
encrypting
it) to intercept some of these email lists of theirs - if necessary, by
forging a subscribe to an _overseas_ nymserver that isn't too well known
(unlike, say, anon.penet.fi). That's about on the same grounds as their
mention of "know thine enemy." (It is, of course, pretty certain that
various libertarian groups are among those monitored, such as cypherpunks.)
Third, this gives additional reasons not to give out one's address to 
anyone.
What people know about me is a post office box and my old address.
        -Allen
- ---- End of forwarded message ----

Cut to save space....
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: 2.6.2

iQCXAwUBMhBRJ+J+JZd/Y4yVAQHjYgQKAiBzkv0iVGlG1wNn3QLJwR/KymkzFeej
ByxF4uLs/IuQ9Np7Y0MZ64rmO7O85z6yoL0iZUegmwfQFuoVX+A3XrN0gtMzA3YR
dyTaOS63IJ5kyBggrSt0Yx6kVT5FtAIELbb3KVC7+oqa2nsc9/DuC24S3uKsSoDm
KZ7/qnHd1nM+Mw==
=2i9v
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----