1996-08-20 - Re: Securing Internet mail at the MTA level
Header Data
From: Simon Spero <ses@tipper.oit.unc.edu>
To: “Erik E. Fair” <fair@cesium.clock.org>
Message Hash: 7120620c609d0941ace3df2a6ddcb3858570d98b57a99f13e5d2f332046e80c2
Message ID: <Pine.SUN.3.91.960820155556.10216C@tipper.oit.unc.edu>
Reply To: <v02140b24ae3fa8d7849e@[17.255.9.110]>
UTC Datetime: 1996-08-20 23:09:59 UTC
Raw Date: Wed, 21 Aug 1996 07:09:59 +0800
Raw message
From: Simon Spero <ses@tipper.oit.unc.edu>
Date: Wed, 21 Aug 1996 07:09:59 +0800
To: "Erik E. Fair" <fair@cesium.clock.org>
Subject: Re: Securing Internet mail at the MTA level
In-Reply-To: <v02140b24ae3fa8d7849e@[17.255.9.110]>
Message-ID: <Pine.SUN.3.91.960820155556.10216C@tipper.oit.unc.edu>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
you really need both object and transport level security; the transport
level stuff helps protect against traffic analysis; the real
authentication and privacy coming from the object level stuff.
Simon
---
Cause maybe (maybe) | In my mind I'm going to Carolina
you're gonna be the one that saves me | - back in Chapel Hill May 16th.
And after all | Email address remains unchanged
You're my firewall - | ........First in Usenet.........
Thread
Return to August 1996
- Return to ““Erik E. Fair” (Time Keeper) <fair@cesium.clock.org>”
- Return to ““Erik E. Fair” (Timekeeper) <fair@cesium.clock.org>”
- Return to ““Perry E. Metzger” <perry@piermont.com>”
Return to “Simon Spero <ses@tipper.oit.unc.edu>”
- 1996-08-20 (Wed, 21 Aug 1996 06:22:09 +0800) - Re: Securing Internet mail at the MTA level - “Erik E. Fair” (Time Keeper) <fair@cesium.clock.org>
- 1996-08-20 (Wed, 21 Aug 1996 07:09:59 +0800) - Re: Securing Internet mail at the MTA level - Simon Spero <ses@tipper.oit.unc.edu>
- 1996-08-21 (Wed, 21 Aug 1996 08:52:55 +0800) - Re: Securing Internet mail at the MTA level - “Erik E. Fair” (Timekeeper) <fair@cesium.clock.org>
- 1996-08-21 (Thu, 22 Aug 1996 05:19:44 +0800) - Re: Securing Internet mail at the MTA level - “Perry E. Metzger” <perry@piermont.com>