1996-08-09 - Re: Thank you.

Header Data

From: iang@cs.berkeley.edu (Ian Goldberg)
To: cypherpunks@toad.com
Message Hash: 71d5fef7d05ec46b556d71fce5e1acb7864212ce3d7fc0475abec194ab1bd256
Message ID: <4ue24a$2ov@abraham.cs.berkeley.edu>
Reply To: <199608081616.SAA01670@basement.replay.com>
UTC Datetime: 1996-08-09 07:05:50 UTC
Raw Date: Fri, 9 Aug 1996 15:05:50 +0800

Raw message

From: iang@cs.berkeley.edu (Ian Goldberg)
Date: Fri, 9 Aug 1996 15:05:50 +0800
To: cypherpunks@toad.com
Subject: Re: Thank you.
In-Reply-To: <199608081616.SAA01670@basement.replay.com>
Message-ID: <4ue24a$2ov@abraham.cs.berkeley.edu>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain


-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----

In article <199608081616.SAA01670@basement.replay.com>,
Anonymous <nobody@REPLAY.COM> wrote:
>I forgot the name of the person who wrote the patches
>to the Linux kernel for stego.
>
>They work perfectly, and I had no problems setting it up.
>
>Many thanks.
>
No problem.  I urge you to push (on linux-kernel@vger.rutgers.edu and/or
comp.os.linux.development.system) for its inclusion in the standard kernel
before 2.1 comes out.  Stego isn't that useful a feature, if the very fact
of having a modified kernel that supports it, is incriminating...

   - Ian

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: 2.6.2

iQCVAwUBMgqLhkZRiTErSPb1AQFtaQP/c63xDJDKJ6T3FmgmswdPDX/Sw2zTiGdS
WiZyFvZmj2o1TgAcJI+TisvBD6DPatJWD6xdCnmJD04fvCB1UsYsJsVuNJv1WSCi
epgJ0o/FO0jM8ESj/z60XcllCQtHR7n1kQti9PFjZB2jpOTRRsERD6owwEnsNtIf
up0R5wTmxdQ=
=yxMM
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----





Thread