From: Rick Campbell <campbell@c2.org>
To: cypherpunks@toad.com
Message Hash: 7ccb639d6bca9ecab3cda048fdf00ea5799231734eb9a18bb11e5bedefd648e5
Message ID: <9608281246.AA15630@cfdevx1.lehman.com>
Reply To: <199608280257.TAA25752@scn.org>
UTC Datetime: 1996-08-28 15:49:31 UTC
Raw Date: Wed, 28 Aug 1996 23:49:31 +0800
From: Rick Campbell <campbell@c2.org>
Date: Wed, 28 Aug 1996 23:49:31 +0800
To: cypherpunks@toad.com
Subject: Re: Microsoft Explorer security hole (fwd) MSoft's reply...
In-Reply-To: <199608280257.TAA25752@scn.org>
Message-ID: <9608281246.AA15630@cfdevx1.lehman.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
Date: Tue, 27 Aug 1996 19:57:53 -0700 (PDT)
From: SCN User <bf578@scn.org>
BTW: When is this list/listserver going to convert the reply-to fields to
point to cypherpunks@toad.com?
Hopefully never. It's the wrong way for a distribution list to work.
If you personally want replies to just go to the list, then you can
add a reply-to field in your message. I prefer when people do a
standard `reply all' to reply to me and CC the recipients of my
message. In that way, I can file messages to a list in a folder while
treating those that are explicitly specially -- I might want to see
them sooner so as to reply sooner.
The distribution list should just distribute messages. The sender
should determine the addressing.
Rick
Return to August 1996
Return to “Robert Hettinga <rah@shipwright.com>”