From: Sandy Sandfort <sandfort@crl.com>
Date: Fri, 9 Aug 1996 15:14:50 +0800
To: "Timothy C. May" <tcmay@got.net>
Subject: Re: Imprisoned for Not Having a Gun?
In-Reply-To: <ae2f8d2303021004ed0d@[205.199.118.202]>
Message-ID: <Pine.SUN.3.91.960808151142.29184B-100000@crl11.crl.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain


~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
                          SANDY SANDFORT
 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

C'punks,

On Thu, 8 Aug 1996, Timothy C. May wrote:

> Regarding that town nearby that passed a _requirement_ that all
> households have a gun:
> ...
> Pro-gun fascism is just as bad a anti-gun fascism.
> 
> I do recall that the "you must have a gun" town had some
> exemptions for folks opposed to guns, blah blah, but it still
> is intensely revolting to me that any town could ever pass
> such a law...

I can't find the exact quote, but Will Rogers quipped that every
time Congress made a law, it was a joke.  And every time Congress
made a joke it was a law.  The town near Morton Grove was not
making a real requirement that every household have a gun, they
were just making a joke at Morton Grove's expense.  In addition
to the "exceptions," there was no penalty for violation of the
law, thus making sure it was unenforceable.  It was not a case
of "pro-gun fascism" but of rough American political humor.  At
the very least it kept the city council out of more serious 
mischief.


 S a n d y

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~