From: qut@netcom.com (Skip)
To: droelke@rdxsunhost.aud.alcatel.com (Daniel R. Oelke)
Message Hash: 85a04bf72ec061d8f8e1191a96b3717e5d097be26069135a421327b436b692b2
Message ID: <199608211550.IAA22958@netcom.netcom.com>
Reply To: <9608211346.AA21049@spirit.aud.alcatel.com>
UTC Datetime: 1996-08-21 19:21:56 UTC
Raw Date: Thu, 22 Aug 1996 03:21:56 +0800
From: qut@netcom.com (Skip)
Date: Thu, 22 Aug 1996 03:21:56 +0800
To: droelke@rdxsunhost.aud.alcatel.com (Daniel R. Oelke)
Subject: Re: PreRFD: comp.org.cypherpunks
In-Reply-To: <9608211346.AA21049@spirit.aud.alcatel.com>
Message-ID: <199608211550.IAA22958@netcom.netcom.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
! No and HELL no.
!
! I find that this list gets enough crap as it is, and gatewaying it to
! a generally available Usenet group would just add to the noise level.
!
! Now, if you want to gateway it to a local group because you
I've never mentioned gatewaying, I'm only for that with moderated
mailing lists, unlike cypherpunks .
! like your newsreader better than your email reader,
! be my guest.
Not personally relevent, my favorite newsreader can be used for e-mail, but
it's clumsy for that function.
! > Subject: PreRFD: comp.org.cypherpunks
! >
! > The Subject: line says it all.
! >
! > My suggestion number one:
! >
! > No moderation.
My suggestion number two:
No gateway. The list and newsgroup stays seperated.
--
Skip, OBC
Return to August 1996
Return to “qut@netcom.com (Skip)”