1996-08-14 - Re: (Off Topic) Re: FCC_ups

Header Data

From: Justin Card <Wyntermute@postoffice.worldnet.att.net>
To: cypherpunks@toad.com
Message Hash: 8e63de8ff8d91fe7a159d2cfedccaa5aec769932a6e591fe2c2fa7e74e75c770
Message ID: <3210496C.5153@postoffice.worldnet.att.net>
Reply To: <199608120538.WAA29683@dns2.noc.best.net>
UTC Datetime: 1996-08-14 08:41:08 UTC
Raw Date: Wed, 14 Aug 1996 16:41:08 +0800

Raw message

From: Justin Card <Wyntermute@postoffice.worldnet.att.net>
Date: Wed, 14 Aug 1996 16:41:08 +0800
To: cypherpunks@toad.com
Subject: Re: (Off Topic) Re: FCC_ups
In-Reply-To: <199608120538.WAA29683@dns2.noc.best.net>
Message-ID: <3210496C.5153@postoffice.worldnet.att.net>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain


David Wagner wrote:

> The *real* challenge: how do you support sender- and recipient- anonymous
> phone calls with strong security?  Have fun.

If you're only encrypting/decrypting at each end, couldn't a key
exchange like Diffie-Hellman work?  Or is this not the "anonymous"
feature you were looking at?

-- 
Wyntermute





Thread