1996-08-14 - Re: (Off Topic) Re: FCC_ups
Header Data
From: Justin Card <Wyntermute@postoffice.worldnet.att.net>
To: cypherpunks@toad.com
Message Hash: 8e63de8ff8d91fe7a159d2cfedccaa5aec769932a6e591fe2c2fa7e74e75c770
Message ID: <3210496C.5153@postoffice.worldnet.att.net>
Reply To: <199608120538.WAA29683@dns2.noc.best.net>
UTC Datetime: 1996-08-14 08:41:08 UTC
Raw Date: Wed, 14 Aug 1996 16:41:08 +0800
Raw message
From: Justin Card <Wyntermute@postoffice.worldnet.att.net>
Date: Wed, 14 Aug 1996 16:41:08 +0800
To: cypherpunks@toad.com
Subject: Re: (Off Topic) Re: FCC_ups
In-Reply-To: <199608120538.WAA29683@dns2.noc.best.net>
Message-ID: <3210496C.5153@postoffice.worldnet.att.net>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
David Wagner wrote:
> The *real* challenge: how do you support sender- and recipient- anonymous
> phone calls with strong security? Have fun.
If you're only encrypting/decrypting at each end, couldn't a key
exchange like Diffie-Hellman work? Or is this not the "anonymous"
feature you were looking at?
--
Wyntermute
Thread
Return to August 1996
- Return to “Adam Shostack <adam@homeport.org>”
- Return to “daw@cs.berkeley.edu (David Wagner)”
- Return to ““James A. Donald” <jamesd@echeque.com>”
- Return to “Justin Card <Wyntermute@postoffice.worldnet.att.net>”
Return to “Rabid Wombat <wombat@mcfeely.bsfs.org>”
- 1996-08-12 (Mon, 12 Aug 1996 17:22:59 +0800) - Re: (Off Topic) Re: FCC_ups - “James A. Donald” <jamesd@echeque.com>
- 1996-08-12 (Tue, 13 Aug 1996 05:01:03 +0800) - Re: (Off Topic) Re: FCC_ups - Rabid Wombat <wombat@mcfeely.bsfs.org>
- 1996-08-13 (Tue, 13 Aug 1996 21:30:32 +0800) - Re: (Off Topic) Re: FCC_ups - daw@cs.berkeley.edu (David Wagner)
- 1996-08-13 (Wed, 14 Aug 1996 04:25:56 +0800) - Re: (Off Topic) Re: FCC_ups - Adam Shostack <adam@homeport.org>
- 1996-08-14 (Wed, 14 Aug 1996 16:41:08 +0800) - Re: (Off Topic) Re: FCC_ups - Justin Card <Wyntermute@postoffice.worldnet.att.net>