1996-08-02 - Re: Tolerance

Header Data

From: shamrock@netcom.com (Lucky Green)
To: “Chris Adams” <cypherpunks@toad.com>
Message Hash: 9621832785519a9f5a78c02dc4dd85cee9237a6b807f9176ff9078dc4bee1554
Message ID: <v02120d1aae276b170492@[192.0.2.1]>
Reply To: N/A
UTC Datetime: 1996-08-02 13:38:35 UTC
Raw Date: Fri, 2 Aug 1996 21:38:35 +0800

Raw message

From: shamrock@netcom.com (Lucky Green)
Date: Fri, 2 Aug 1996 21:38:35 +0800
To: "Chris Adams" <cypherpunks@toad.com>
Subject: Re: Tolerance
Message-ID: <v02120d1aae276b170492@[192.0.2.1]>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain


At 14:46 8/1/96, Chris Adams wrote:
>Just a comment to all of the 'true libertarians' out there, especially
>the "defend to the death" types:  How many of you defended Mr.
>Sternlight's recent membership?

There was nothing to defend. To the best of my knowledge, nobody suggested
that DS be thrown off the list. One joker unsubed Sternlight, but that was
hardly something that he couldn't fix himself. Did I want him on the list?
Hell no. Do I believe he has a right to join the list? Yes, with one
possible exception. The list owner can ban anybody, since the list is using
the owner's resources. In this case, from a libertarian standpoint, not
even an explanation of such an action would be required.



-- Lucky Green <mailto:shamrock@netcom.com> PGP encrypted mail preferred.
   Defeat the Demopublican Unity Party. Vote no on Clinton/Dole in November.
   Vote Harry Browne for President.







Thread