From: dlv@bwalk.dm.com (Dr.Dimitri Vulis KOTM)
Date: Wed, 21 Aug 1996 02:37:00 +0800
To: cypherpunks@toad.com
Subject: Re: [RANT] Death of Usenet: Film at 11
In-Reply-To: <Pine.GUL.3.95.960820013922.5850D-100000@Networking.Stanford.EDU>
Message-ID: <9wJysD56w165w@bwalk.dm.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain


Rich Graves <rich@c2.org> writes:
> > * If rejected messages were indicated by simply missing a signature of
> > approval, voluntary not searched for by individual readers, it would be
> > harder to claim moderator censorship. Or to accomplish it, for that
> > matter.
> >
> > * Multiple independent moderators could work on the same newsgroup.
> >
> > * If the stamp of approval were dissociated from the message proper,
> > messages could propagate without waiting for the moderator's
> > receive-email-and-post cycle. The moderator's "OK" would catch up later,
> > for those readers that wait for it.
>
> Innaresting. Sort of a reverse NoCeM. I like it, but of course you'd have to
> distribute the clients by magic.

Why 'reverse'? NoCeM's can be used to both 'hide' and 'highlight' articles.

---

Dr.Dimitri Vulis KOTM
Brighton Beach Boardwalk BBS, Forest Hills, N.Y.: +1-718-261-2013, 14.4Kbps