1996-08-07 - Re: Phone tapping in India

Header Data

From: Gary Howland <gary@systemics.com>
To: Arun Mehta <amehta@giasdl01.vsnl.net.in>
Message Hash: 9c11c25604b38f72814f6fe4f1421862ffe424a91189b10436c2542074988fa4
Message ID: <3208C12F.15FB7483@systemics.com>
Reply To: <1.5.4.32.19960807114112.002e8fa4@giasdl01.vsnl.net.in>
UTC Datetime: 1996-08-07 21:18:51 UTC
Raw Date: Thu, 8 Aug 1996 05:18:51 +0800

Raw message

From: Gary Howland <gary@systemics.com>
Date: Thu, 8 Aug 1996 05:18:51 +0800
To: Arun Mehta <amehta@giasdl01.vsnl.net.in>
Subject: Re: Phone tapping in India
In-Reply-To: <1.5.4.32.19960807114112.002e8fa4@giasdl01.vsnl.net.in>
Message-ID: <3208C12F.15FB7483@systemics.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain


Arun Mehta wrote:
>  
> Under a box titled "Beware of blank calls", the newspaper mentions that
> when the sleuths ring your number to start tapping, you get a "blank" call
> (which one is quite used to here -- if that were enough evidence, the whole
> of India is being tapped!)
> 
> What technology is this? If it indeed works this way, what is to prevent any
> large company or rich person from procuring the same hardware?

Do telephones have "caller control" in India? (ie. if you call
someone, can the callee not hang you up?).  If they do, then the
technology is quite straightforward, being a device that emulates
the exchange and proxies on calls.

Gary
--
pub  1024/C001D00D 1996/01/22  Gary Howland <gary@systemics.com>
Key fingerprint =  0C FB 60 61 4D 3B 24 7D  1C 89 1D BE 1F EE 09 06 
^S
^A^Aoft FAT filesytem is extremely robust, ^Mrarely suffering from^T^T





Thread