From: “Paul S. Penrod” <furballs@netcom.com>
To: cypherpunks@toad.com
Message Hash: 9dad2ba69a322e3aee7ef8acdc3413e54d9bc86591345783e8d0aba9e8ca8f9a
Message ID: <Pine.3.89.9608170814.A2211-0100000@netcom>
Reply To: <32153700.41C6@ai.mit.edu>
UTC Datetime: 1996-08-17 18:03:46 UTC
Raw Date: Sun, 18 Aug 1996 02:03:46 +0800
From: "Paul S. Penrod" <furballs@netcom.com>
Date: Sun, 18 Aug 1996 02:03:46 +0800
To: cypherpunks@toad.com
Subject: Re: Lunch with Bill, anyone?
In-Reply-To: <32153700.41C6@ai.mit.edu>
Message-ID: <Pine.3.89.9608170814.A2211-0100000@netcom>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
On Fri, 16 Aug 1996, the glorious Hallam-Baker prognosticated:
> John C. Randolph wrote:
>
> > Does Microsquish *know* any industry luminaries? I mean, Cutler
> > used to be one, but he's pretty burnt out, if Windoze NT is any
> > indication.
>
> Butler Lampson and Rashid are both pretty hot. Cutler got NT
> to a workable state considerably faster than he got VMS to
> one.
>
> There are many computer companies that are full of Bozos,
> Microsoft isn't one of them. Most of the people griping about
> Microsoft can't code any better.
>
Depends. If it's media, then you are correct. If it's technical, then
you're not. The biggest complaints about MS I hear come from people that
actually know what they are talking about and are damn good at it.
> I'm interested that Navigator 3b6 crashes several times daily
> while Internet Explorer has yet to crash on me. I couldn't
> care less about fancy features, at this stage I want a browser
> that is reliable - like they used to be.
>
> Phill
>
This is why it's called a "Beta" Phill...
As for reliable, there is no such thing... there is only MTBF.
...Paul
Return to August 1996
Return to ““Paul S. Penrod” <furballs@netcom.com>”