1996-08-07 - Re: Internal Passports

Header Data

From: dlv@bwalk.dm.com (Dr.Dimitri Vulis KOTM)
To: cypherpunks@toad.com
Message Hash: a7d4a3e3f76769a2f6178a306076d365f5d930d25302fa420c0f1035c24c042d
Message ID: <ygN9RD39w165w@bwalk.dm.com>
Reply To: <2.2.32.19960806044723.01073e4c@vertexgroup.com>
UTC Datetime: 1996-08-07 13:33:54 UTC
Raw Date: Wed, 7 Aug 1996 21:33:54 +0800

Raw message

From: dlv@bwalk.dm.com (Dr.Dimitri Vulis KOTM)
Date: Wed, 7 Aug 1996 21:33:54 +0800
To: cypherpunks@toad.com
Subject: Re: Internal Passports
In-Reply-To: <2.2.32.19960806044723.01073e4c@vertexgroup.com>
Message-ID: <ygN9RD39w165w@bwalk.dm.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain


jfricker@vertexgroup.com (John F. Fricker) writes:
> Hmmm. Actually a long time ago I lost my job with Greenpeace out of refusal
> to sign an I-9 which was in '86 the Department of Justice's form to exhibit
> eligibility to work in the US. The form required that I present two pieces
> of photo identification or a driver's license to be authenticated by my
> employer. Maybe it's a CA state law that adds an additional skin tone
> criterium to for the filing of an I-9.

I-9 lists the documents that can be accepted as 1) proof of identity, 2)
proof of the right to work in the U.S. A U.S. passport can be used for both.
When I need to fill out the I-9, I simply present my passport. (Before I
had the passport, I used to present my naturaliation certificate, which is
also acceptable.)

A driver's licence is not sufficient because it only proves your identify,
but doesn't prove that you're allowed to have a job. There are classes of
aliens who are allowed to drive, but aren't allowed to work - e.g.,
students on J-1 visa.

---

Dr.Dimitri Vulis KOTM
Brighton Beach Boardwalk BBS, Forest Hills, N.Y.: +1-718-261-2013, 14.4Kbps





Thread