1996-08-21 - Re: Securing Internet mail at the MTA level

Header Data

From: Dave Crocker <dcrocker@brandenburg.com>
To: cmcurtin@research.megasoft.com
Message Hash: ae45d4879431bf84649ddd81fff5b463e6092e88ce37bd6b0c5c6c9db56ebe13
Message ID: <v03007821ae3fe53616d2@[205.214.160.151]>
Reply To: <199608201529.LAA01469@goffette.research.megasoft.com>
UTC Datetime: 1996-08-21 05:16:10 UTC
Raw Date: Wed, 21 Aug 1996 13:16:10 +0800

Raw message

From: Dave Crocker <dcrocker@brandenburg.com>
Date: Wed, 21 Aug 1996 13:16:10 +0800
To: cmcurtin@research.megasoft.com
Subject: Re: Securing Internet mail at the MTA level
In-Reply-To: <199608201529.LAA01469@goffette.research.megasoft.com>
Message-ID: <v03007821ae3fe53616d2@[205.214.160.151]>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain


At 8:29 AM -0700 8/20/96, C Matthew Curtin wrote:
>    2. Waiting for a cryptographic transport layer network protocol
>       (such as what is being proposed in draft-ietf-tls-ssh-00),
>       allowing SMTP to remain untouched, and only requiring MTAs to
>       add support for the new network protocol.
>
>I like the second approach better, because it allows more problems to
>be solved with one move, and it would be easier to add crypto

	This presumes that everyone uses Internet protocols for transport.

	That is a marginal assumption, in today's world.

	Probably ok for long term, though.

d/

--------------------
Dave Crocker                                            +1 408 246 8253
Brandenburg Consulting                             fax: +1 408 249 6205
675 Spruce Dr.                                 dcrocker@brandenburg.com
Sunnyvale CA 94086 USA                       http://www.brandenburg.com

Internet Mail Consortium               http://www.imc.org, info@imc.org







Thread