1996-08-16 - Re: Burden of proof

Header Data

From: Bill Stewart <stewarts@ix.netcom.com>
To: cypherpunks@toad.com
Message Hash: b12700d60a30e39c1381b7490f1a11f25f063240a674671961a727a20176adda
Message ID: <199608160545.WAA01171@toad.com>
Reply To: N/A
UTC Datetime: 1996-08-16 08:06:12 UTC
Raw Date: Fri, 16 Aug 1996 16:06:12 +0800

Raw message

From: Bill Stewart <stewarts@ix.netcom.com>
Date: Fri, 16 Aug 1996 16:06:12 +0800
To: cypherpunks@toad.com
Subject: Re: Burden of proof
Message-ID: <199608160545.WAA01171@toad.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain


At 05:31 PM 8/15/96 -0700, DAVID A MOLNAR <molnard1@nevada.edu> wrote:
>	What is to stop the IRS from pointing out that you received the 
>money from your employer? 

What employer?  What money?  Some Anguillan consulting bodyshop
sent some guys who did the work, and MegaCo paid the bodyshop.
The shop paid the guys some typical low wages, and also
bought computer services from another Anguillan company,
which deposited its profits in its bank account in Jersey.
Employee Jean D'Eau used the company Visa card for the account 
and took some business trips to San Diego, stayed in 
a hotel in Seattle, rented cars, ate out, bought computer toys at
47th St. Computer, paid for his Netcom account,
and got a Visa Cash advance in Jamaica.  No problem, mon.







Thread