1996-08-05 - Re: fbi, crypto, and defcon

Header Data

From: Arun Mehta <amehta@giasdl01.vsnl.net.in>
To: Robert Hettinga <cypherpunks@toad.com
Message Hash: b2f8e9fbdb3c376759591331ba53ec11f85d7dd5718c2f1a35f5665504747a34
Message ID: <1.5.4.32.19960805124321.003064b0@giasdl01.vsnl.net.in>
Reply To: N/A
UTC Datetime: 1996-08-05 18:17:09 UTC
Raw Date: Tue, 6 Aug 1996 02:17:09 +0800

Raw message

From: Arun Mehta <amehta@giasdl01.vsnl.net.in>
Date: Tue, 6 Aug 1996 02:17:09 +0800
To: Robert Hettinga <cypherpunks@toad.com
Subject: Re: fbi, crypto, and defcon
Message-ID: <1.5.4.32.19960805124321.003064b0@giasdl01.vsnl.net.in>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain


At 10:10 04/08/96 -0400, Robert Hettinga wrote:
>At 2:06 AM -0400 8/4/96, anonymous-remailer@shell.portal.com wrote:
>> As long as they are doing any kind of usage-based
>> charging, that actual act of charging will continue to cost
>> considerably more than the data transmission.
>
>Ah. So, why settle the transactions for digital cash and skip all that
>overhead? Yet another application for micromoney.

True, though even better would be simply to charge you a flat
rate. If billing is that expensive, why bother? 

What happened to the proposals asking for flat-rate pricing before the FCC?

Arun Mehta Phone +91-11-6841172, 6849103 amehta@cpsr.org
http://www.cerfnet.com/~amehta/  finger amehta@cerfnet.com for public key






Thread