From: Alan Horowitz <alanh@infi.net>
Date: Mon, 19 Aug 1996 03:22:36 +0800
To: Adamsc <Adamsc@io-online.com>
Subject: Re: Burden of proof
In-Reply-To: <19960818074654046.AAA160@IO-ONLINE.COM>
Message-ID: <Pine.SV4.3.91.960818122245.21967I-100000@larry.infi.net>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain


On Sun, 18 Aug 1996, Adamsc wrote:

> On the other hand, if your employer was willing to do some sneaky ecash
> stuff, then it might get interesting.

   Which alternate universe are you in, Chris, where employers don't want
to DECLARE AND DEDUCT their salary expenses - every last penny of it? 
Which planet is that, where a company can afford to set up a structural
cost in its operations, that its competitors don't have? 



> "Sorry, this is all I have left"

   No problem, they will get a judgement against all your future earnings.


There are ways around the taxation problem, but they don't involve hiding 
facts from the US Govt. This is the cold, hard reality. Get used to it.