From: Andrew Loewenstern <andrew_loewenstern@il.us.swissbank.com>
To: cypherpunks@toad.com
Message Hash: bec4417e0dd167aeded30e69051a7b6c1793c68f6ae3ccd8a2e0253287d84502
Message ID: <9608282355.AA00745@ch1d157nwk>
Reply To: <199608281900.TAA15017@pipe2.t2.usa.pipeline.com>
UTC Datetime: 1996-08-29 06:24:59 UTC
Raw Date: Thu, 29 Aug 1996 14:24:59 +0800
From: Andrew Loewenstern <andrew_loewenstern@il.us.swissbank.com>
Date: Thu, 29 Aug 1996 14:24:59 +0800
To: cypherpunks@toad.com
Subject: Re: SUN_pak
In-Reply-To: <199608281900.TAA15017@pipe2.t2.usa.pipeline.com>
Message-ID: <9608282355.AA00745@ch1d157nwk>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
I was looking at the description of this patent (thanks to JYA for providing
easy access to this article...), and I can't believe Sun got a patent for
this. Tunneling encrypted IP sessions over regular IP by using a gateway
router is hardly a novel idea and is immediately obvious to anyone who is
knowledgable in networking and crypto. Aren't there already products out
there (hardware and software) that implement this sort of thing? I seem to
remember Cisco producing a router and MorningStar producing software that did
this. I also seem to remember the concept being discussed on this very list
several years back (can't check the archives from work though...) I believe
there is even a name for it: VPN (Virtual Private Networks) John Gilmore
is currently putting together a project to do much the same thing in
software...
Did I miss something innovative in this patent, or is this another example
of clueless patent examiners granting patents for things that don't deserve
patent protection?
andrew
Return to August 1996
Return to “Andrew Loewenstern <andrew_loewenstern@il.us.swissbank.com>”
Unknown thread root