1996-08-16 - Re:BlackNet as a Distributed, Untraceable, Robust Data Haven

Header Data

From: mccoy@communities.com (Jim McCoy)
To: cypherpunks@toad.com
Message Hash: c2567a604c7e882ab016d81ba8ede71d29104befaeb99e9bd6804384f36ff7e8
Message ID: <v02140b01ae39deb35eab@[204.179.131.136]>
Reply To: N/A
UTC Datetime: 1996-08-16 09:44:30 UTC
Raw Date: Fri, 16 Aug 1996 17:44:30 +0800

Raw message

From: mccoy@communities.com (Jim McCoy)
Date: Fri, 16 Aug 1996 17:44:30 +0800
To: cypherpunks@toad.com
Subject: Re:BlackNet as a Distributed, Untraceable, Robust Data Haven
Message-ID: <v02140b01ae39deb35eab@[204.179.131.136]>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain


Tim May writes:
>
> I have to speak up here and say that there is an actual working exemplar of
> a distributed, untraceable data haven. While it lacks a robust _payment_
> mechanism, that is also untraceable, so does the "Visit Port Watson"
> example (which has never actually existed)

BlackNet also lacks any sense of persistence.  A message posted lives at
the whim of newsgroup expiration policies and getting a copy of an expired
message is a non-trivial task.  It is also not an overt data haven, there
is really no address or pointer you can direct someone to and say "look
here."  Usenet as a data haven is like dropping messages in to bottles
and casting them in to the sea; getting it where you want and having the
intended recipient be able to find the data easily is still an unsolved
problem.  It is a bulletin board for establishing private two-party
communications on any topic, but it is not even close to being a mechanism
for "publishing" in the manner to which people have becomed accostomed to on
the net.

jim








Thread