1996-08-31 - Re: WashPost report on airline security plan

Header Data

From: Black Unicorn <unicorn@schloss.li>
To: Alan Horowitz <alanh@infi.net>
Message Hash: c4a81594a12d5034462b6337ae9046431d035b76c99a808e5432586d0473535a
Message ID: <Pine.SUN.3.94.960831151506.18155A-100000@polaris>
Reply To: <Pine.SV4.3.91.960831115709.16705A-100000@larry.infi.net>
UTC Datetime: 1996-08-31 21:17:24 UTC
Raw Date: Sun, 1 Sep 1996 05:17:24 +0800

Raw message

From: Black Unicorn <unicorn@schloss.li>
Date: Sun, 1 Sep 1996 05:17:24 +0800
To: Alan Horowitz <alanh@infi.net>
Subject: Re: WashPost report on airline security plan
In-Reply-To: <Pine.SV4.3.91.960831115709.16705A-100000@larry.infi.net>
Message-ID: <Pine.SUN.3.94.960831151506.18155A-100000@polaris>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain


On Sat, 31 Aug 1996, Alan Horowitz wrote:

> Any one else see the analysis I saw on newsgroup (forget which) which 
> analyzed the pattern of damage to the aircraft, and came to the conclusion 
> that it had to be a proximity-fused missle.

If so it was most likely radar guided.  These tend to be larger, more
restricted, and harder to come by.

The terrorist angle becomes harder to develop in this case.

--
I hate lightning - finger for public key - Vote Monarchist
unicorn@schloss.li

Thread

• Return to August 1996

• Return to “Alan Horowitz <alanh@infi.net>”
• Return to “Black Unicorn <unicorn@schloss.li>”
• Return to “David Lesher <wb8foz@nrk.com>”

• Return to “Declan McCullagh <declan@eff.org>”

• 1996-08-31 (Sun, 1 Sep 1996 01:03:28 +0800) - WashPost report on airline security plan - David Lesher <wb8foz@nrk.com>
  • 1996-08-31 (Sun, 1 Sep 1996 02:04:42 +0800) - Re: WashPost report on airline security plan - Alan Horowitz <alanh@infi.net>
    • 1996-08-31 (Sun, 1 Sep 1996 05:17:24 +0800) - Re: WashPost report on airline security plan - Black Unicorn <unicorn@schloss.li>
  • 1996-08-31 (Sun, 1 Sep 1996 04:14:06 +0800) - Re: WashPost report on airline security plan - Declan McCullagh <declan@eff.org>