From: “Geoffrey C. Grabow” <gcg@pb.net>
To: jim@ACM.ORG
Message Hash: cec92e7b8102c08de4ff5c27f3ce209309a5675c852349c52e09cdad5ac2db39
Message ID: <2.2.32.19960802021606.00697f50@mail.pb.net>
Reply To: N/A
UTC Datetime: 1996-08-02 04:43:46 UTC
Raw Date: Fri, 2 Aug 1996 12:43:46 +0800
From: "Geoffrey C. Grabow" <gcg@pb.net>
Date: Fri, 2 Aug 1996 12:43:46 +0800
To: jim@ACM.ORG
Subject: Re: Is 1024-bit PGP key enough?
Message-ID: <2.2.32.19960802021606.00697f50@mail.pb.net>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
At 15:38 08/01/96 PDT, Jim Gillogly wrote:
>
>Somebody says:
>>> Is security provided by 1024-bit PGP key sufficient against most powerful
>>> computers that are available today? Say if smoe organization spent 10
>>> billions of dollars on a cracking machine, would it be possible to crack
>>> the keys in reasonable time?
>
>Derek Atkins <warlord@MIT.EDU> responds with some useful and authoritative
>information -- thanks.
>
Also, remember that although the PGP key is 1024 bits, it generates a much
smaller IDEA key with 56 bits (I think... anyone?). The 56 bit key is
vunerable to that $1 mil mystery machine that the NSA may or may not have.
G.C.G.
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
| Geoffrey C. Grabow | Great people talk about ideas. |
| Oyster Bay, New York | Average people talk about things. |
| gcg@pb.net | Small people talk about people. |
|----------------------------------------------------------------------|
| PGP 2.6.2 public key available at http://www.pb.net/~wizard |
| and on a plethora of key servers around the world. |
|----------------------------------------------------------------------|
| That which does not kill us, makes us stranger. - Trevor Goodchild |
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Return to August 1996
Return to ““Mark M.” <markm@voicenet.com>”