1996-08-16 - re: Billy boy’s satellites [Was - Floating DataHavens]

Header Data

From: bugs@netcom.com (Mark Hittinger)
To: cypherpunks@toad.com
Message Hash: daad89767794d4beb12fad8eb611a477fa08837f2724340fedf92add76e2b8cb
Message ID: <199608161424.HAA03018@netcom17.netcom.com>
Reply To: N/A
UTC Datetime: 1996-08-16 17:40:51 UTC
Raw Date: Sat, 17 Aug 1996 01:40:51 +0800

Raw message

From: bugs@netcom.com (Mark Hittinger)
Date: Sat, 17 Aug 1996 01:40:51 +0800
To: cypherpunks@toad.com
Subject: re: Billy boy's satellites [Was - Floating DataHavens]
Message-ID: <199608161424.HAA03018@netcom17.netcom.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain


>
> > Vincent Cate wrote:
> > You can get Internet via radio links for reasonable prices.  And via
> > satellite for almost affordable prices.  When Bill Gates 900 satellites
> > get up there it should be very affordable.
>
> Gary Howland wrote:
> ... if a tad unrealiable?
> The thought of 900 satelites in low orbit, all running NT, makes me
> shudder.  Brings a new meaning to the expression "OS crash".
> 

Its been a little over a year but I had heard that the current design was
for a lower number of MEO satellites.  

I would think that cypherpunks would want to see this happen.  The political
problems are probably larger than the technical ones :-)

Regards,

Mark Hittinger
Netcom/Dallas
bugs@netcom.com





Thread