From: hallam@Etna.ai.mit.edu
To: Sandy Sandfort <sandfort@crl.com>
Message Hash: deb533268cfd3ad553344d607c03aae6dec4b48408c226f299e6afb714e95cd3
Message ID: <9608030331.AA07184@Etna.ai.mit.edu>
Reply To: <Pine.SUN.3.91.960802191032.26652B-100000@crl5.crl.com>
UTC Datetime: 1996-08-03 05:20:01 UTC
Raw Date: Sat, 3 Aug 1996 13:20:01 +0800
From: hallam@Etna.ai.mit.edu
Date: Sat, 3 Aug 1996 13:20:01 +0800
To: Sandy Sandfort <sandfort@crl.com>
Subject: Re: VISA Travel Money
In-Reply-To: <Pine.SUN.3.91.960802191032.26652B-100000@crl5.crl.com>
Message-ID: <9608030331.AA07184@Etna.ai.mit.edu>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
I don't think that VISA travel money will be a major product
for VISA. When I spoke with Azbo about it it was not a
major strategic direction for them. He described its use by
First Bank of Internet (later first Branch of Internet). I think that
VISA would LIKE to provide the Ability for travel money, to function
as a debit card, but it would then be very close to their existing
product of secured payment cards.There are good reasons why aproduct
that allows you to draw a specific amount of cash out of ATM's is a good
idea for VISA and useful for a small number of customers, but I think
you're reading way to much into this. Much more interesting are proposals
by the Federal reserve Board, to exempt from regulation E certain types of
stored value card provided they store no more than $100. While $500 would
seem to me to be a more serious and sensible level while still not having
particular money laundering advantage (5 $100 bills is smaller than
one smart card) it is at least a start.
Phill
PS Be willing to bet donuts provided he can suggest a way of delivering them
via internet.
Return to August 1996
Return to “Sandy Sandfort <sandfort@crl.com>”