1996-08-13 - Re: [NOISE] “X-Ray Gun” for imperceptible searches

Header Data

From: shamrock@netcom.com (Lucky Green)
To: cypherpunks@toad.com
Message Hash: e5c71f9a46ae0fc7c152f2fed10e9d23821d9e8f041552c4764f7fbd96f74720
Message ID: <v02120d0cae366bab297f@[192.0.2.1]>
Reply To: N/A
UTC Datetime: 1996-08-13 22:16:07 UTC
Raw Date: Wed, 14 Aug 1996 06:16:07 +0800

Raw message

From: shamrock@netcom.com (Lucky Green)
Date: Wed, 14 Aug 1996 06:16:07 +0800
To: cypherpunks@toad.com
Subject: Re: [NOISE] "X-Ray Gun" for imperceptible searches
Message-ID: <v02120d0cae366bab297f@[192.0.2.1]>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain


At 9:27 8/13/96, Peter Trei wrote:

>I vaguely remember another possibly relevant precedent, where a
>judge ruled that a warrant was required before a thermal imager
>could be used to look at a house suspected by the police of
>being a (pot) grow house.

Wrong. No warrant was used and the bust was upheld in court.




-- Lucky Green <mailto:shamrock@netcom.com> PGP encrypted mail preferred.
   Defeat the Demopublican Unity Party. Vote no on Clinton/Dole in November.
   Vote Harry Browne for President.







Thread