From: Jim Gillogly <jim@ACM.ORG>
Date: Tue, 20 Aug 1996 07:17:19 +0800
To: cypherpunks@toad.com
Subject: Re: Why BlackNet *IS* a Data Haven
In-Reply-To: <ae3debf410021004545e@[205.199.118.202]>
Message-ID: <199608191857.LAA18109@mycroft.rand.org>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain



tcmay@got.net (Timothy C. May) writes:
>An article on the cover of "Information Week" last summer triggered new
>interest, and a couple of new messages addressed to "BlackNet"--the ones I
>tried to read apparently used a spoofed key, or the one Dettweiler created
>and placed ahead of mine on the MIT keyserver (the shorter key that the MIT
>group was able to eventually break).

For the record, the four of us who broke the 384-bit BlackNet key weren't
from MIT:  Paul Leyland (Oxford), Arjen Lenstra (Bellcore), Alec Muffet
(Sun-UK), and Jim Gillogly (RAND).

	Jim Gillogly
	27 Wedmath S.R. 1996, 18:56