1996-08-29 - Re: Scoring Politicians on Digital Liberty Issues (Re: Net Politics)

Header Data

From: Rich Graves <rich@c2.org>
To: fight-censorship@vorlon.mit.edu
Message Hash: f4062a807ca1adbcc3865cbde9d0f3cafc90ffe139604571d598fde746410c1e
Message ID: <Pine.GUL.3.95.960828142934.7901C-100000@Networking.Stanford.EDU>
Reply To: <Pine.BSI.3.91.960828120051.16596A-100000@dcez.nicom.com>
UTC Datetime: 1996-08-29 01:53:48 UTC
Raw Date: Thu, 29 Aug 1996 09:53:48 +0800

Raw message

From: Rich Graves <rich@c2.org>
Date: Thu, 29 Aug 1996 09:53:48 +0800
To: fight-censorship@vorlon.mit.edu
Subject: Re: Scoring Politicians on Digital Liberty Issues (Re: Net Politics)
In-Reply-To: <Pine.BSI.3.91.960828120051.16596A-100000@dcez.nicom.com>
Message-ID: <Pine.GUL.3.95.960828142934.7901C-100000@Networking.Stanford.EDU>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain


On Wed, 28 Aug 1996, Keith Glass wrote:

> Pick 10-20 issues/votes.  Rate each congresscritter AND THEIR OPPONENTS 
> based on "our" stand on the issues. Give a numerical score, based on 
> percentage of "correct" positions.

I don't think an overall numerical score would be very useful, given the
inevitable squabbling over how to weight different questions. Leahy voted
for DT and against CDA; Burns voted for CDA and against DT. Who is worse?

NOTE: The above is intended as a rhetorical question!

-rich






Thread