From: Adamsc@io-online.com (Adamsc)
Date: Mon, 30 Sep 1996 13:39:25 +0800
To: "tcmay@got.net>
Subject: Re: The Petaflops Boondoggle Computer (was PET_ard)
Message-ID: <19960930035040656.AAC252@IO-ONLINE.COM>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain


On Sun, 29 Sep 1996 12:16:27 -0800, Timothy C. May wrote:

>Symmetric multiprocessing is available, but it's often much less hassle to
>have a single CPU running at 200 MHz than to try games with multiple
>processors (which means more PCB real estate, more sockets, more of other
>things).

As far as SMP goes, it's actually not all that expensive.  People in the
linux-smp list have reported differences of as little as $50 for a
uniprocessor vs. dual pentium system.   Of course, every so often we'll get a
message about a $30,000 system that can handle up to <drool>64 Pentium
Pros</drool>! 

#  Chris Adams <adamsc@io-online.com>   | http://www.io-online.com/adamsc/adamsc.htp
#  <cadams@acucobol.com>		 | send mail with subject "send PGPKEY"
"That's our advantage at Microsoft; we set the standards and we can change them."
   --- Karen Hargrove, Microsoft (quoted in the Feb 1993 Unix Review editorial)