1996-09-11 - Re: Child Porn as Thoughtcrime

Header Data

From: Mike McNally <m5@tivoli.com>
To: Declan McCullagh <declan@eff.org>
Message Hash: 02980177e97325c3526f163617e0f779261b7d3948219ed8ad762c17083f5f90
Message ID: <3236A627.510F@tivoli.com>
Reply To: <Pine.SUN.3.91.960910203403.13178D-100000@eff.org>
UTC Datetime: 1996-09-11 19:02:37 UTC
Raw Date: Thu, 12 Sep 1996 03:02:37 +0800

Raw message

From: Mike McNally <m5@tivoli.com>
Date: Thu, 12 Sep 1996 03:02:37 +0800
To: Declan McCullagh <declan@eff.org>
Subject: Re: Child Porn as Thoughtcrime
In-Reply-To: <Pine.SUN.3.91.960910203403.13178D-100000@eff.org>
Message-ID: <3236A627.510F@tivoli.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain


Declan McCullagh wrote:

> > Q: Is a collage of images of little girls (or boys, one presumes) in
> > swimsuits, with apparent salacious intent, illegal?
> 
> Under the Knox decision, yes. (Dancing girls in leotards are verboten.)

Is this going to have some implications for broadcast of the women's
gymnastic events in the next Olympics?

______c_________________________________________________________________
Mike M Nally * Tiv^H^H^H IBM * Austin TX * For the time being,
       m5@tivoli.com * m101@io.com       *    
      <URL:http://www.io.com/~m101>      * three heads and eight arms.





Thread