1996-09-18 - Re: “Remailers can’t afford to be choosy”

Header Data

From: Adamsc@io-online.com (Adamsc)
To: “E. Allen Smith” <jf_avon@citenet.net>
Message Hash: 0345fad6795c45856e5bcc445ab975812fc36be29ee0bb4f7bc8961d4ad22bf1
Message ID: <19960917191852828.AAA142@IO-ONLINE.COM>
Reply To: N/A
UTC Datetime: 1996-09-18 00:44:16 UTC
Raw Date: Wed, 18 Sep 1996 08:44:16 +0800

Raw message

From: Adamsc@io-online.com (Adamsc)
Date: Wed, 18 Sep 1996 08:44:16 +0800
To: "E. Allen Smith" <jf_avon@citenet.net>
Subject: Re: "Remailers can't afford to be choosy"
Message-ID: <19960917191852828.AAA142@IO-ONLINE.COM>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain


On Sat, 14 Sep 1996 23:58 EDT, E. Allen Smith wrote:

>fetters to win. (In the ultimate extreme, I include gun control under the
>fetters that communism/etcetera need to win... the "redistribution" from
>producers ("rich") to welfare drones ("poor") during the Rodney King riots
>would have been nicely prevented by some shopkeepers with automatic weapons.

As I recall this actually happened in a couple cases, didn't it?

# Chris Adams <adamsc@io-online.com> | http://www.io-online.com/adamsc/adamsc.htp
# cadams@acucobol.com | V.M. (619)515-4894
"I have never been able to figure out why anyone would want to play games on
a computer in any case when the whole system is a game.  Word processing,
spreadsheets, telecoms -- it's all a game.  And they pay you to play it."
	-- Duncan Frissell







Thread