From: pgut001@cs.auckland.ac.nz
To: cypherpunks@toad.com
Message Hash: 0571db32eb73a478864b41a7e5ecc23884e78db0092562a68d25fcb402a0d0c9
Message ID: <84296097823886@cs26.cs.auckland.ac.nz>
Reply To: N/A
UTC Datetime: 1996-09-17 16:21:00 UTC
Raw Date: Wed, 18 Sep 1996 00:21:00 +0800
From: pgut001@cs.auckland.ac.nz
Date: Wed, 18 Sep 1996 00:21:00 +0800
To: cypherpunks@toad.com
Subject: Re: [Long] A history of Netscape/MSIE problems
Message-ID: <84296097823886@cs26.cs.auckland.ac.nz>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
In case anyone's interested, I've finally found the source I used for the
claim that RC2/RC4 were exportable if the details were kept quiet:
"Details about them [RC2 and RC4] have not been published (including by
patenting) in order to maintain their special export status".
-- RSA FAQ, version 1.0, draft 1e, 14 September 1992, p.40.
This makes sense - the NSA wouldn't want the details published to stop non-US
non-crippled versions appearing, and I can't really imagine RSADSI volutarily
not patenting a new algorithm.
Peter.
Return to September 1996
Return to “pgut001@cs.auckland.ac.nz”
1996-09-17 (Wed, 18 Sep 1996 00:21:00 +0800) - Re: [Long] A history of Netscape/MSIE problems - pgut001@cs.auckland.ac.nz