1996-09-20 - Re: PGP in the workplace

Header Data

From: “James A. Donald” <jamesd@echeque.com>
To: Rick Osborne <cypherpunks@toad.com
Message Hash: 06a22908d43d810ea62bac86766cb61be0d9932605c3d0731ec8009c45829d6f
Message ID: <199609200503.WAA25335@dns1.noc.best.net>
Reply To: N/A
UTC Datetime: 1996-09-20 07:00:00 UTC
Raw Date: Fri, 20 Sep 1996 15:00:00 +0800

Raw message

From: "James A. Donald" <jamesd@echeque.com>
Date: Fri, 20 Sep 1996 15:00:00 +0800
To: Rick Osborne <cypherpunks@toad.com
Subject: Re: PGP in the workplace
Message-ID: <199609200503.WAA25335@dns1.noc.best.net>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain


At 11:20 PM 9/17/96 -0400, Rick Osborne wrote:
> Upon explaining to them that I was simply trying to make sure of my own
> security, I was told that I was to just assume that I was secure, and that
> *any* 'poking around' was found to be "highly aggravating" and could only
> only "exascerbate the situation further.".
>
> Now, seeing as I'm fairly new to the Corporate world, but is this something
> common?  

Not at all common in my experience, though whether this is because most
bosses are more enlightened, or because most bosses are pig ignorant
about security, I am not sure.

 ---------------------------------------------------------------------
              				|  
We have the right to defend ourselves	|   http://www.jim.com/jamesd/
and our property, because of the kind	|  
of animals that we are. True law	|   James A. Donald
derives from this right, not from the	|  
arbitrary power of the state.		|   jamesd@echeque.com






Thread