1996-09-03 - Re: What is the EFF doing exactly?

Header Data

From: Bill Stewart <stewarts@ix.netcom.com>
To: Black Unicorn <unicorn@schloss.li>
Message Hash: 06b1c86d4ce5f5b55906367acb782939487abfba26ceecd3bce91262334938e1
Message ID: <199609030615.XAA15848@toad.com>
Reply To: N/A
UTC Datetime: 1996-09-03 09:46:24 UTC
Raw Date: Tue, 3 Sep 1996 17:46:24 +0800

Raw message

From: Bill Stewart <stewarts@ix.netcom.com>
Date: Tue, 3 Sep 1996 17:46:24 +0800
To: Black Unicorn <unicorn@schloss.li>
Subject: Re: What is the EFF doing exactly?
Message-ID: <199609030615.XAA15848@toad.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain


Black Unicorn <unicorn@schloss.li> wrote:
>> > > What is or is not your personal or EFF's official position is
meaningless.
>> > > It is clear that the personal beliefs of those involved in EFF are
>> > > those of compromise, present day politics, and a general lack of moral
>> > > fiber.

While nobody's called Esther Dyson a Communist here yet, there are
people on the board I disagree with - Mitch Kapor, in particular, has shown
signs of being a (gasp!) Democrat!  My initial reaction to the EFF's first
year or two was that they were doing some very good things 
(the Steve Jackson defense), and also had people making speeches about
the need to provide everybody with access to the Information SuperHighway.
Getting the S.266 anti-crypto-pro-wiretapping bill killed a few years
ago was what convinced me to join them, though their compromise positions
on some of the other anti-freedom bills since then have not helped
my mixed views of the organization.  With all due respect to Jerry Berman,
I'm more comfortable now that they're not Washington Insiders any more.

>Why am I any more mistaken  for pointing out that a single influential
>member of EFF's staff or board is anti-anonymity and yet remains with the
>organization than you are for pointing out that a single influential
>member who happened to be anti-anonymity has left?
....
>Maybe there should be an EFF position on the matter.

Maybe.  If it's a good position, it will recognize that anonymity
is a mixed blessing; there are people who use it creatively and
responsibly, like Black Unicorn and Lucky Green, and there are
spammers who abuse it to the detriment of society, like the slimeball
who used my remailer to post hatemail to the gay newsgroups with
somebody else's name attached to the bottom.  On the other hand,
free speech is also a mixed blessing; there _are_ things I wish people
had the good taste not to say, but I'm not going to get in Voltaire's
way while he defends to the death their right to say them...


#			Thanks;  Bill
# Bill Stewart, +1-415-442-2215 stewarts@ix.netcom.com
# <A HREF="http://idiom.com/~wcs"> 	
# You can get PGP software outside the US at ftp.ox.ac.uk/pub/crypto






Thread