1996-09-10 - Re: Anonymous phone calls (was: What is the EFF doing exactly?)

Header Data

From: roy@sendai.scytale.com (Roy M. Silvernail)
To: stewarts@ix.netcom.com
Message Hash: 0cabbbff6e2ae152e62a5cc6d19250043eb657d5bc1856e2899125344b5ecefb
Message ID: <eZkHXDvcwapi@sendai.scytale.com>
Reply To: <199609091748.NAA27475@attrh1.attrh.att.com>
UTC Datetime: 1996-09-10 03:19:36 UTC
Raw Date: Tue, 10 Sep 1996 11:19:36 +0800

Raw message

From: roy@sendai.scytale.com (Roy M. Silvernail)
Date: Tue, 10 Sep 1996 11:19:36 +0800
To: stewarts@ix.netcom.com
Subject: Re: Anonymous phone calls (was: What is the EFF doing exactly?)
In-Reply-To: <199609091748.NAA27475@attrh1.attrh.att.com>
Message-ID: <eZkHXDvcwapi@sendai.scytale.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text


-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----

In your mail, you write:

> At 01:03 PM 9/7/96 CST, roy@scytale.com wrote:

> >Can Telecards be audited for usage?  If a TLA black-bags my $25 Telecard
> >from my wallet, can they reconstruct what calls I made with it?
> 
> Easily.  They get the card number off the card, and then check their
> long distance records for calls made with that card number.

I thought as much.  Does the audit trail extend to local calls too?  (I
suspect it does)
- -- 
           Roy M. Silvernail     [ ]      roy@scytale.com
PGP Public Key fingerprint =  31 86 EC B9 DB 76 A7 54  13 0B 6A 6B CC 09 18 B6
                Key available from pubkey@scytale.com

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: 2.6.2

iQCVAwUBMjSZvxvikii9febJAQHdLQP8DA/xxhnKNZOUex5dp/P4kRgLbgS9HryO
tuR5G4eCnjJsuANxuzuUFrjoRm8jknIOhdnrubcK1fxPwInJdMqWbJ8WDPyJcoCf
5jq4ePpahMa2VUbZRoFOwN86n25l0DHHK8lsWpDQ8y8pg/zqToEyLiUJTUi+RID6
HC5eltYmMJc=
=uj3L
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----






Thread