From: Nico Garcia <raoul@sunspot.tiac.net>
To: rah@shipwright.com
Message Hash: 1c66bacb8ae2da97ceccaa8fe6c2469f189c90e2251a187ed0dfd7faa055026e
Message ID: <199609251533.LAA28373@sunspot.tiac.net>
Reply To: <v03007801ae6df29ec7c8@[206.119.69.46]>
UTC Datetime: 1996-09-26 00:15:54 UTC
Raw Date: Thu, 26 Sep 1996 08:15:54 +0800
From: Nico Garcia <raoul@sunspot.tiac.net>
Date: Thu, 26 Sep 1996 08:15:54 +0800
To: rah@shipwright.com
Subject: Re: LACC: ISPs' information on users
In-Reply-To: <v03007801ae6df29ec7c8@[206.119.69.46]>
Message-ID: <199609251533.LAA28373@sunspot.tiac.net>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Fortunately, if you take a look at USCC 18, I believe section 2701 but
could be off, the police in the US need a subpoena to get that data.
Not a warrant; a *subpoena*. One of the best things that came out of the
Electronic Communications Privacy Act, IMHO.
Nico Garcia
raoul@tiac.net
<PGP is obviously a good idea: look at who objects to it.>
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: 2.6
Comment: Processed by Mailcrypt 3.4, an Emacs/PGP interface
iQCVAwUBMklQx37Cg0E0WGE5AQGTigQAknpxlRZUTdqkXdA2alFVfghKIATkxCe9
MTZuDcma523mbClj6irSZ0EB7ttOq2gT1eC8FeIX0WlqEUu3ZeNFvkmR5uK9HxYd
JdaB3/lrHLGZNvqQ4H50aD0Zlf3ufTRjknJwDTFVBv31GlqJM1458k6IULeRLuMw
HrjkQPgZndQ=
=rL7X
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Return to September 1996
Return to “Robert Hettinga <rah@shipwright.com>”