1996-09-19 - Re: The Near-Necessity of Health Insurance

Header Data

From: Asgaard <asgaard@Cor.sos.sll.se>
To: cypherpunks@toad.com
Message Hash: 23e94c723ce695b4a3b2c86b99fd7a35990266ee2dd840cf8fcc282c089f274d
Message ID: <Pine.HPP.3.91.960919043840.16973B-100000@cor.sos.sll.se>
Reply To: <01I9MKL4PCX48Y4YUZ@mbcl.rutgers.edu>
UTC Datetime: 1996-09-19 06:06:45 UTC
Raw Date: Thu, 19 Sep 1996 14:06:45 +0800

Raw message

From: Asgaard <asgaard@Cor.sos.sll.se>
Date: Thu, 19 Sep 1996 14:06:45 +0800
To: cypherpunks@toad.com
Subject: Re: The Near-Necessity of Health Insurance
In-Reply-To: <01I9MKL4PCX48Y4YUZ@mbcl.rutgers.edu>
Message-ID: <Pine.HPP.3.91.960919043840.16973B-100000@cor.sos.sll.se>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain


On Wed, 18 Sep 1996, E. Allen Smith wrote:

>	While this is certainly your business, I would suggest at least
>one physical a year, including blood work, as a good preventative measure...
>I believe it _has_ been shown to extend lives; I can do a Medline lookup if
>desired.

Save yourself the trouble. To _show_ such a thing one would have to:

1) get some 10.000 persons, chosen 'randomly' (at least not chosen when
   they have already consulted medical proffessionals) to willingly 
   participate in the study and accept whatever group they would be
   coin-tossed into
2) randomize them into two groups of 5000 each
3) have one group checked anually and the other group not checked
4) wait 20-50 years
5) compare the groups for mortality

Without consulting Medline I can tell you that such a study has
not and will never be done. And all other approaches to try to
prove such a thing could be heavily criticized for likely bias.

Health tests, especially 'blood work', are done for profit, with
very little, if anything at all, to gain for the subjects. (There
are a few possible exceptions, f ex PAP-smears. Blood pressure is
more doubtful and cholesterol is a joke. But I'm not going to
argue on the details in this forum.)


Asgaard






Thread