From: Matthew Lyle <matt@nova.org>
To: snow <snow@smoke.suba.com>
Message Hash: 24e41ab3b1d10e2dcce38d8062f0b342caa90eac0e103b25a0b7fbe11a0b64fc
Message ID: <Pine.SOL.3.93.960910084530.23972A-100000@beta.nova.org>
Reply To: <Pine.LNX.3.93.960909113515.1028C-100000@smoke.suba.com>
UTC Datetime: 1996-09-10 16:20:26 UTC
Raw Date: Wed, 11 Sep 1996 00:20:26 +0800
From: Matthew Lyle <matt@nova.org>
Date: Wed, 11 Sep 1996 00:20:26 +0800
To: snow <snow@smoke.suba.com>
Subject: Re: Court challenge to AOL junk-mail blocks
In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.3.93.960909113515.1028C-100000@smoke.suba.com>
Message-ID: <Pine.SOL.3.93.960910084530.23972A-100000@beta.nova.org>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
On Mon, 9 Sep 1996, snow wrote:
> On Fri, 6 Sep 1996 AwakenToMe@aol.com wrote:
> > Tell me about it. Im on AOL. WHO CARESSSSSSS if ya get one MAYBE two pieces
> > of mail you take LESS than a second to delete them both with the handy
> > delete key. These people are wasting more time complaining about it than they
> > will ever do actually deleting it.
>
> I would guess that AOL isn't doing it just because of user complaints.
> AOL has millions of accounts, and spammers try to hit ALL of the addresses.
> That probably (I am guessing here) doubles (or triples) the load on AOL's
> already over burdened mail system.
The news reports that I've read also say that, at least in the case of
Cyberpromo, 75% of their email database is AOL addresses.
Matt
Return to September 1996
Return to “snow <snow@smoke.suba.com>”