From: “P. J. Ponder” <ponder@freenet.tlh.fl.us>
To: cypherpunks@toad.com
Message Hash: 25ae25ad939694d2e1c3aaded6877f53eda474785bd7f5221e1323a2f5f538b6
Message ID: <Pine.OSF.3.91.960831233808.23669B-100000@fn3.freenet.tlh.fl.us>
Reply To: N/A
UTC Datetime: 1996-09-01 05:40:14 UTC
Raw Date: Sun, 1 Sep 1996 13:40:14 +0800
From: "P. J. Ponder" <ponder@freenet.tlh.fl.us>
Date: Sun, 1 Sep 1996 13:40:14 +0800
To: cypherpunks@toad.com
Subject: Esther Dyson on Remailers
Message-ID: <Pine.OSF.3.91.960831233808.23669B-100000@fn3.freenet.tlh.fl.us>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
pretty grim reading in the LA Times article if that is really the EFF
position on remailers.
could someone straighten this out, or at least give us the EFF's view of
why remailers are a bad thing?
with friends like that, who needs enemies?
---------------
So long, Julf - Thank you for a valuable public service!
Best of luck to you!
--
to unsubscribe, mail to majordomo@toad.com a message that reads:
unsubscribe cypherpunks (in the message body, not subject line).
Return to September 1996
Return to ““P. J. Ponder” <ponder@freenet.tlh.fl.us>”
1996-09-01 (Sun, 1 Sep 1996 13:40:14 +0800) - Esther Dyson on Remailers - “P. J. Ponder” <ponder@freenet.tlh.fl.us>