1996-09-07 - Re: Court challenge to AOL junk-mail blocks

Header Data

From: mccoy@communities.com (Jim McCoy)
To: cypherpunks@toad.com
Message Hash: 27e9d84ee63139633794d0f244189a60d8e85c7f80d2fb4f8190868c7cabbbbc
Message ID: <v02140b03ae56d6064840@[205.162.51.35]>
Reply To: N/A
UTC Datetime: 1996-09-07 08:42:18 UTC
Raw Date: Sat, 7 Sep 1996 16:42:18 +0800

Raw message

From: mccoy@communities.com (Jim McCoy)
Date: Sat, 7 Sep 1996 16:42:18 +0800
To: cypherpunks@toad.com
Subject: Re: Court challenge to AOL junk-mail blocks
Message-ID: <v02140b03ae56d6064840@[205.162.51.35]>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain


frogfarm@yakko.cs.wmich.edu writes:
> This is utter horseshit. AOL, like any private individual or organization,
> has the right to refuse service to anyone at any time for any reason, or
> even for no reason at all. The gubmint isn't doing SQUAT, except forcing
> AOL to allow the spammers access.

AOL has a service agreement with their customers, and they are not allowed
to change the rules just because they feel like it (I believe that this
is called a contract :)  This is the jist of the injunction.

jim







Thread