1996-09-25 - Re: Bork book

Header Data

From: Bill Stewart <stewarts@ix.netcom.com>
To: cypherpunks@toad.com
Message Hash: 283fa46c2be3fccdfdfc253d55d5f328c770bae48b259f8e3314d4ab6d106ade
Message ID: <199609250609.XAA23128@dfw-ix12.ix.netcom.com>
Reply To: N/A
UTC Datetime: 1996-09-25 08:27:35 UTC
Raw Date: Wed, 25 Sep 1996 16:27:35 +0800

Raw message

From: Bill Stewart <stewarts@ix.netcom.com>
Date: Wed, 25 Sep 1996 16:27:35 +0800
To: cypherpunks@toad.com
Subject: Re: Bork book
Message-ID: <199609250609.XAA23128@dfw-ix12.ix.netcom.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain


At 11:28 AM 9/24/96 -0400, "Marc J. Wohler" <mwohler@ix.netcom.com> wrote:
>Heard him on Limbaugh pushing hard for censorship as a cure for society's
>problems.  Looks like Ted Kennedy & Co. were right to keep him off the court.

Bork's comment a few years ago about the Ninth Amendment being an 
ink-blot on the Constitution was one of those Rorschach things you
can interpret either way, but given that he clearly doesn't believe
in the First Amendment, I'd guess he wouldn't have helped the 9th 
or the other rights-protecting amendments either.

I didn't catch Bork directly, but I heard Limbaugh talking about it the
day before and about half an hour after, so I caught some flavor of it.

It was interesting hearing Limbaugh's mixed feelings about it;
he seems to clearly _approve_ of censoring people that offend him,
like 2 Live Crew, but also realizes that people would want to censor _him_.
I'm guessing that the schtick he did on Pee-Wee Herman (with background
music by Michael Jackson) a few minutes before saying he'd be interviewing
Bork on Friday was coincidence, rather than something he'd done to set
the tone of a discussion of censorship, but maybe not.

#			Thanks;  Bill
# Bill Stewart, +1-415-442-2215 stewarts@ix.netcom.com
# <A HREF="http://idiom.com/~wcs"> 	
# You can get PGP software outside the US at ftp.ox.ac.uk/pub/crypto






Thread