From: Stephen Humble <deeb@x.org>
To: tcmay@got.net
Message Hash: 2e6fbebdc3628973126ff4f22ab4d791bda120d76b258e7a596df89c67eefb9b
Message ID: <9609251720.AA20644@hydra.cde.x.org>
Reply To: <ae6df1260502100417f8@[207.167.93.63]>
UTC Datetime: 1996-09-26 01:03:48 UTC
Raw Date: Thu, 26 Sep 1996 09:03:48 +0800
From: Stephen Humble <deeb@x.org>
Date: Thu, 26 Sep 1996 09:03:48 +0800
To: tcmay@got.net
Subject: Re: ISPs' information on users
In-Reply-To: <ae6df1260502100417f8@[207.167.93.63]>
Message-ID: <9609251720.AA20644@hydra.cde.x.org>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
tcmay@got.net (Timothy C. May) sez:
> Could ISPs in the UlS. be compelled to report on the browsing and
> net surfing habits of their customer base?
Such as when the police/feds/Big Brother's Helpers come in, seize
every piece of computer equipment on the site for "investigation", put
it in a warehouse for 2 years so they can read everything and save
whatever appeals to them in their private databases? As Steve Jackson
Games found out, it can be slow and expensive to get the "evidence"
back and the satisfaction of watching a judge ream BBH is no guarantee
that such shenanigans will cease.
I hope the ISP used strong encryption on all their disks and tapes.
Sadly, I have no idea how to make sure an ISP I use does that
properly or how to get an exhaustive list of what kind of records they
keep.
tcmay@got.net (Timothy C. May) sez:
> To make this clear, I don't mean in a specific criminal case, where
> the records are searchable under a warrant. I mean a blanket order
> that all ISPs compile and forward records.
How many pieces of thread does it take to make a blanket?
Stephen
Return to September 1996
Return to “tcmay@got.net (Timothy C. May)”