From: qut@netcom.com (Dave Harman OBC)
To: N/A
Message Hash: 2ec8a620d8211100906c66bf151091bc9ce5fc710cdaea61213f35060de98d40
Message ID: <199609012004.NAA11397@netcom3.netcom.com>
Reply To: <199609011633.LAA30982@manifold.algebra.com>
UTC Datetime: 1996-09-01 22:02:23 UTC
Raw Date: Mon, 2 Sep 1996 06:02:23 +0800
From: qut@netcom.com (Dave Harman OBC)
Date: Mon, 2 Sep 1996 06:02:23 +0800
Subject: Re: Bob Dole is on Drugs
In-Reply-To: <199609011633.LAA30982@manifold.algebra.com>
Message-ID: <199609012004.NAA11397@netcom3.netcom.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
! http://allpolitics.com/news/9608/31/radio.addresses/
!
! ... snip ...
!
! Dole, who returned to Washington for Labor Day
! weekend, also pledged to use the White House as a
! bully pulpit to promote the "moral message"
! against drugs and to criticize what he called the
! entertainment industry's glamorization of drug use.
!
! On Sunday, he is to address the convention of the
! National Guard Association of the United States
! during which he's expected to propose that the
! military be enlisted to assist in a renewed war on
! drugs.
So why didn't you support Pat Buchanan for president, the ONLY
candidate to support even a partial legalization of marijuana? Speaking
of legalizing drugs, wouldn't it be a good tactic to demand the absolute
legalization of ALL drugs? The compromise eventually to follow would be
a vast improvement over the status quo.
I'm voting Libertarian, and thinking of registering as such, even though
I can't stand their capitalist economics, they stand by allowing people
to organize and speak out against the very ideals that allowed them to
do such. Our government is so corrupt, swinging a figurative axe against
it could very well lead to improvement.
Return to September 1996
Return to “qut@netcom.com (Dave Harman OBC)”