1996-09-01 - Re: Bob Dole is on Drugs

Header Data

From: qut@netcom.com (Dave Harman OBC)
To: N/A
Message Hash: 2ec8a620d8211100906c66bf151091bc9ce5fc710cdaea61213f35060de98d40
Message ID: <199609012004.NAA11397@netcom3.netcom.com>
Reply To: <199609011633.LAA30982@manifold.algebra.com>
UTC Datetime: 1996-09-01 22:02:23 UTC
Raw Date: Mon, 2 Sep 1996 06:02:23 +0800

Raw message

From: qut@netcom.com (Dave Harman OBC)
Date: Mon, 2 Sep 1996 06:02:23 +0800
Subject: Re: Bob Dole is on Drugs
In-Reply-To: <199609011633.LAA30982@manifold.algebra.com>
Message-ID: <199609012004.NAA11397@netcom3.netcom.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain


! http://allpolitics.com/news/9608/31/radio.addresses/
! 
! ... snip ...
! 
!    Dole, who returned to Washington for Labor Day
!    weekend, also pledged to use the White House as a
!    bully pulpit to promote the "moral message"
!    against drugs and to criticize what he called the
!    entertainment industry's glamorization of drug use.
! 
!    On Sunday, he is to address the convention of the
!    National Guard Association of the United States
!    during which he's expected to propose that the
!    military be enlisted to assist in a renewed war on
!    drugs. 

So why didn't you support Pat Buchanan for president, the ONLY 
candidate to support even a partial legalization of marijuana?  Speaking
of legalizing drugs, wouldn't it be a good tactic to demand the absolute
legalization of ALL drugs?  The compromise eventually to follow would be 
a vast improvement over the status quo.

I'm voting Libertarian, and thinking of registering as such, even though
I can't stand their capitalist economics, they stand by allowing people
to organize and speak out against the very ideals that allowed them to
do such.  Our government is so corrupt, swinging a figurative axe against
it could very well lead to improvement.





Thread