From: frantz@netcom.com (Bill Frantz)
Date: Sun, 15 Sep 1996 06:56:53 +0800
To: Bill Stewart <stewarts@ix.netcom.com>
Subject: Re: Erasing Disks
Message-ID: <199609142059.NAA13108@netcom8.netcom.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain


N.B. Your disagreement is with Peter's paper, not me unless I have
inadvertently misrepresented what he wrote.

At  2:15 AM 9/14/96 -0700, Bill Stewart wrote:
>I disagree.  The methods for declassification in the Army and
>Defense Department security manuals included several approaches:
>1) Physical destruction - acid, sandblasters, etc.
>2) NSA-Approved Whopping Big Magnets

I think Peter was looking for non-destructive methods which would allow
continued use of the hard disk
>3) NSA-Approved Hopefully-Bugfree computer programs for some computers.
>
>The most secure methods were the unclassified ones - after we
>sandblasted our RM05 disk packs, the NSA and KGB can't read anything.
>The less secure methods are the ones that require NSA approval -
>how strong  is a Whopping Big Magnet this year?  (Too strong to put 
>near MY computer lab, thank you! :-)

Peter thinks this strength is to strong for practical application.  He
describes someone who had a strong enough research magnet which bent the
platters.  Since erasing the clocking tracks requires them to be rewritten
at the factory, magnets do not allow reuse of hard disks.

>But shredding the floppy?  No need to classify that, no secrets leaked

Burn after shredding, or you have a puzzle fan reassembling the shredded disk.

Hastily, but with regards - Bill


-------------------------------------------------------------------------
Bill Frantz       | "Cave softly, cave safely, | Periwinkle -- Consulting
(408)356-8506     | and cave with duct tape."  | 16345 Englewood Ave.
frantz@netcom.com |           - Marianne Russo | Los Gatos, CA 95032, USA