1996-09-08 - Re: The Esther Dyson Flap

Header Data

From: edyson@edventure.com (Esther Dyson)
To: Chuck Thompson <chuck@nova1.net>
Message Hash: 3e5a9f7a358c268073b47efc9588613b620f6c073251e3410effd76e383bb27f
Message ID: <19960908135750483.AAO156@Esther>
Reply To: N/A
UTC Datetime: 1996-09-08 16:22:21 UTC
Raw Date: Mon, 9 Sep 1996 00:22:21 +0800

Raw message

From: edyson@edventure.com (Esther Dyson)
Date: Mon, 9 Sep 1996 00:22:21 +0800
To: Chuck Thompson <chuck@nova1.net>
Subject: Re: The Esther Dyson Flap
Message-ID: <19960908135750483.AAO156@Esther>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain


FWIW, I'm still collecting some thoughts, because this is a complex topic
(as you all know), and I'm tired of having my views misinterpreted and
misattributed.  So I want to state them clearly and carefully.  This is
simply a reaction to one item. 


 At 09:12 PM 9/4/96 -0500, Chuck Thompson wrote:
>>Date: Tue, 3 Sep 1996 14:23:40 -0700
>>X-Sender: tcmay@mail.got.net
>>To: cypherpunks@toad.com
>>From: tcmay@got.net (Timothy C. May)
>>Subject: Re: The Esther Dyson Flap
>>Sender: owner-cypherpunks@toad.com
>>
......................

Please note the quote marks carefully.  I said [something like] the first
paragraph, but the rest is the "reporter" from Scientology, plus a paraphrase.

>>
>>By the way, the Scientologists have also noted her views:
>>
>>"Esther Dyson, member of the board of directors of the Electronic Frontier
>>Foundation and member of the National Information Infrastructure Advisory
>>Council, spoke on the anonymity issue at the fifth Computers, Freedom &
>>Privacy (CFP) conference in San Francisco. "I have a concern about the
>>spread of bad behavior on the Net," said Dyson. "Anonymity figures into
>>this, and I feel that it has proven to not be a positive factor. It breaks
>>down
>>the community which we are seeking to build, and could turn the 'big
>>cities' of the information infrastructure into a big cesspool."
>>
>>"Remailers who facilitate anonymous postings are part of the problem. They
>>can act as conduits for those who seek anonymity as a way to act illegally
>>without getting caught; yet remailers are able to shield themselves from
>>responsibility or liability.
>>
>>"Computer experts stress that anonymous users should at least be trackable
>>by the remailers -- and that ones who act unlawfully can easily put the
>>remailers at risk. Dyson noted that in self-regulatory schemes for almost
>>any part of the Internet, "visibility, not anonymity, would have a strong
>>place.""
>>
>>(end quote, from "Freedom," at http://www.theta.com/goodman/hijack.htm)
>>
>

Esther Dyson				Always make new mistakes!
EDventure Holdings
<edyson@edventure.com> 
1 (212) 924-8800
1 (212) 924-0240 fax
104 Fifth Avenue
New York, NY 10011 USA 
www.edventure.com
High-Tech Forum in Lisbon, October 27-29, 1996
PC Forum in Tucson, Arizona, March 23-26, 1997






Thread