1996-09-13 - Re: 56 kbps modems

Header Data

From: Enzo Michelangeli <enzo@ima.com>
To: Asgaard <asgaard@Cor.sos.sll.se>
Message Hash: 3f9677cdb2d40564e985feb097694e30e4cf63bd54ec81104503249dbb9198ec
Message ID: <Pine.WNT.3.94.960913232122.-410977C-100000@enzohome.ima.com>
Reply To: <Pine.HPP.3.91.960913140446.12376A-100000@cor.sos.sll.se>
UTC Datetime: 1996-09-13 20:17:48 UTC
Raw Date: Sat, 14 Sep 1996 04:17:48 +0800

Raw message

From: Enzo Michelangeli <enzo@ima.com>
Date: Sat, 14 Sep 1996 04:17:48 +0800
To: Asgaard <asgaard@Cor.sos.sll.se>
Subject: Re: 56 kbps modems
In-Reply-To: <Pine.HPP.3.91.960913140446.12376A-100000@cor.sos.sll.se>
Message-ID: <Pine.WNT.3.94.960913232122.-410977C-100000@enzohome.ima.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain


On Fri, 13 Sep 1996, Asgaard wrote:

> >U.S. Robotics and Rockwell International are planning new modems with
> >speeds up to 56 kbps a second, almost double the speed of the fastest
> >rate now available.  The new devices should be available by the end of
> >the year, although their top speed initially may be less than 56 kbps.
> >(Wall Street Journal 12 Sep 96 B11)
> 
> People who seemed to know used to say that 'the Shannon limit'
> set an absolute upper limit around 40 kbps. Has Shannon been
> proven wrong, or what?

Well, it all depends on the signal-to-noise ratio. Also, if the noise is
not white gaussian the situation can be even better.

Enzo







Thread