From: "James A. Donald" <jamesd@echeque.com>
Date: Thu, 5 Sep 1996 03:32:04 +0800
To: Jon Lebkowsky <stewarts@ix.netcom.com (Bill Stewart)
Subject: Re: What is the EFF doing exactly?
Message-ID: <199609041557.IAA00970@dns1.noc.best.net>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain


At 03:17 PM 9/3/96 -0700, Jon Lebkowsky wrote:
>>> Not necessarily. The character of the anonymous speech is decisive. If you
>>> use anonymity to cloak harassment, for instance, the anonymity (which
>>> removes accountability) is a problem.  The accountability issue is real and
>>> should be addressed, not evaded.

At 07:44 AM 9/3/96 -0700, James A. Donald wrote:
>>No:  The harassment is the problem, not the anonymity that makes it
>>possible.

At 06:52 AM 9/4/96 -0500, Jon Lebkowsky wrote:
>The harassment is one problem, the lack of accountability another. 

So:  

Lucky Green and Dark Unicorn are not accountable.  This is a problem?

Because it is a problem "We" need to do something about it, 
 ---------------------------------------------------------------------
              				|  
We have the right to defend ourselves	|   http://www.jim.com/jamesd/
and our property, because of the kind	|  
of animals that we are. True law	|   James A. Donald
derives from this right, not from the	|  
arbitrary power of the state.		|   jamesd@echeque.com