From: azur@netcom.com (Steve Schear)
Date: Sat, 14 Sep 1996 15:11:01 +0800
To: cypherpunks@toad.com
Subject: Re: Child Porn as Thoughtcrime
Message-ID: <v02130500ae5f8ef9ebb6@[10.0.2.15]>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain


What if someone combined images now generally considered pornographic under
current U.S. law, with a pressing political message.  For example, a nude
pre-teen holding a picket sign saying "F*** Censorship."  How would the
courts separate the protected speech (content) from the sexual (context)?



PGP Fingerprint: FE 90 1A 95 9D EA 8D 61  81 2E CC A9 A4 4A FB A9
---------------------------------------------------------------------
Snoop Daty Data           | Internet: azur@netcom.com
Grinder                   | Voice: 1-702-655-2877
Sacred Cow Meat Co.       | Fax: 1-702-658-2673
7075 W. Gowan Road, #2148 |
Las Vegas, NV 89129       |
---------------------------------------------------------------------

Just say NO to perscription DRUGS.