From: "E. ALLEN SMITH" <EALLENSMITH@ocelot.Rutgers.EDU>
Date: Tue, 3 Sep 1996 07:16:20 +0800
To: adam@homeport.org
Subject: Re: Whistleblowing on the Internet
Message-ID: <01I90C52IMZ49JDDSI@mbcl.rutgers.edu>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain


	There's also the point that some whistleblowing isn't exactly
what some political groups would want to occur. For instance, opponents
to unions such as myself aren't going to want a whistleblower to be able
conveniently to report their exclusion from a job due to union membership.
	-Allen

From:	IN%"adam@homeport.org"  "Adam Shostack" 27-AUG-1996 02:41:17.66
To:	IN%"geoff@digidem.com"
CC:	IN%"cypherpunks@toad.com"
Subj:	RE: Whistleblowing on the Internet

Geoffrey Gussis wrote:

| Overall, I am quite surprised that there isn't a whistleblowing
| clearinghouse on the Internet; a site sponsored by a non-profit that lists
| email addresses and secure forms for sending anonymized email to those
| areas of the public and private sector that deal with whistleblowing.  As
| the Internet is a great medium for information dissemination, and offers
| significant privacy advantages, I really expected to find much more.

	Such a clearinghouse is what we call a fat target; something
likely to attract attention since wiretapping it could be very useful
to an organization that worried about having a whistleblower.

	As such, the correct attitude towords whistleblowing is to use
an anonymous remailer, and send to interested parties.  That's how the
AT&T deal that sunk the des phones and made clipper a household word
was publicized; a member of the list(?) interested party sent a
number of interesting documents through remailers to cypherpunks.

Adam

-- 
"It is seldom that liberty of any kind is lost all at once."
					               -Hume