1996-09-03 - Re: Educating former anon.penet.fi users about other remailers

Header Data

From: Johan Helsingius <julf@penet.fi>
To: Bill Stewart <stewarts@ix.netcom.com>
Message Hash: 69ad1f8a0ac5997d4fb4fec277540c0576fc81209578d7931759aa4207c25e6e
Message ID: <1.5.4.32.19960903141834.0084bc34@pentu.penet.fi>
Reply To: N/A
UTC Datetime: 1996-09-03 19:16:41 UTC
Raw Date: Wed, 4 Sep 1996 03:16:41 +0800

Raw message

From: Johan Helsingius <julf@penet.fi>
Date: Wed, 4 Sep 1996 03:16:41 +0800
To: Bill Stewart <stewarts@ix.netcom.com>
Subject: Re: Educating former anon.penet.fi users about other remailers
Message-ID: <1.5.4.32.19960903141834.0084bc34@pentu.penet.fi>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain


>If somebody were to put together a one-page note on other remailers,
>would it make sense to send it to all the penet.fi users?
>A canonical cypherpunks approach would be to just write one and
>send it to na000001@anon.penet.fi ..... na600000@anon.penet.fi,
>but I assume either my system or Julf's would decide it was spam
>and discard it (even if it were split up into 60,000 10-message chunks.)

Yes, that´s what would happen. And I fear what woudl happen, load-wise,
if I tried to send 700.000 messages. 

Might be a good idea to post it into the appropriate newsgroups, at least. 

        Julf






Thread