From: “Ross Wright” <rwright@adnetsol.com>
To: cypherpunks@toad.com
Message Hash: 6b4532096ce02ed9938b193bcf335101011918d998e12175ce5f7f11c1c18c6a
Message ID: <199609130029.RAA25390@adnetsol.adnetsol.com>
Reply To: N/A
UTC Datetime: 1996-09-13 03:12:53 UTC
Raw Date: Fri, 13 Sep 1996 11:12:53 +0800
From: "Ross Wright" <rwright@adnetsol.com>
Date: Fri, 13 Sep 1996 11:12:53 +0800
To: cypherpunks@toad.com
Subject: Re: mailing lists
Message-ID: <199609130029.RAA25390@adnetsol.adnetsol.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
On Or About: 12 Sep 96 at 18:11, Rabid Wombat wrote:
>
> > more restricted. I'm personally against needing to pay the social costs of
> > more and more laws because someone is trying to make a buck any way he
> > can, regardless of the costs and annoyances to others.
> >
> > Junk faxing was a blessedly short term fad, one that had to be legislated
> >
> > I'm completely in favor of allowing junk email, as long as "JUNK MAIL" is
> > required to be the first thing on the subject line. PLONK! ... but that
> > will take yet another law ...
>
Wombat:
If you are "against needing to pay the social costs of more and more
laws" Then how come you want another one?
> IE," as long as "JUNK MAIL" is required to be the first thing on
> the subject line. PLONK! >... but that will take yet another law
> > ... "!
One more law to pay for, one foot in the door for the government.
Don't call for new legislation in order to not get spam! Please.
Ross
===========
Ross Wright
King Media: Bulk Sales of Software Media and Duplication Services
http://www.slip.net/~cdr/kingmedia
Voice: 415-206-9906
Return to September 1996
Return to ““Ross Wright” <rwright@adnetsol.com>”
1996-09-13 (Fri, 13 Sep 1996 11:12:53 +0800) - Re: mailing lists - “Ross Wright” <rwright@adnetsol.com>